Search Results
6/12/2025, 5:07:29 PM
>>16695778
Already happened and advertisers found their logos didn't get enough publicity from it to make it worth the cost. As for naming things after corporate sponsors, most people simply wouldn't use the commercial name. Sports media agreed to do it for stadiums because sports leagues have contracts with sports media for it to happen. You'd need for science journals to take sponsorships before there would be pressure on them to use the sponsor names of scientific equipment.
NASA has looked into it and concluded it small amount of money it would gain would not be worth the hassle of involving commercial sponsors with their own set of demands that could conflict with those of the mission.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/11/science/nasa-corporate-sponsors.html
It's worth noting that SpaceX does use the name 'Gulf of America' in its media. While not a commercial sponsorship, the name is controversial and SpaceX openly using it is seen by many as a endorsement of President Trump.
Already happened and advertisers found their logos didn't get enough publicity from it to make it worth the cost. As for naming things after corporate sponsors, most people simply wouldn't use the commercial name. Sports media agreed to do it for stadiums because sports leagues have contracts with sports media for it to happen. You'd need for science journals to take sponsorships before there would be pressure on them to use the sponsor names of scientific equipment.
NASA has looked into it and concluded it small amount of money it would gain would not be worth the hassle of involving commercial sponsors with their own set of demands that could conflict with those of the mission.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/11/science/nasa-corporate-sponsors.html
It's worth noting that SpaceX does use the name 'Gulf of America' in its media. While not a commercial sponsorship, the name is controversial and SpaceX openly using it is seen by many as a endorsement of President Trump.
Page 1