>>24461368
i don't really know that you could, that seems to me a subjective opinion. at any rate, i think books that are purely aesthetic, or at least lean aesthetic, are okay from time to time. not everything has to be deep philosophical discourse or immaculately plotted to be a fun read.
the problem comes when people refuse to acknowledge flaws within the work, and adamantly assert that it's a masterpiece simply because they themselves enjoy it.
the inverse is what you're doing, which is claiming it has no value whatsoever. but the world does not operate on black and white.