Search Results
7/12/2025, 10:07:19 PM
>>715284672
keep telling yourself that
keep telling yourself that
ID: w6FLGGpO/biz/60478629#60486609
6/10/2025, 9:55:28 PM
>>60486558
>muh 5%
The UN Genocide Convention defines genocide as acts committed "with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group." There's no percentage threshold. The Srebrenica massacre killed "only" 0.5% of Bosnia's Muslim population and was ruled genocide by international courts. The key factor is intent to destroy a group, not hitting some arbitrary death percentage.
>they could do worse
That's like saying "I'm not an abuser because I could beat you harder if I wanted to." The capacity for greater violence doesn't justify current violence. By this logic:
- The Khmer Rouge wasn't genocidal because they "only" killed 25% of Cambodia instead of everyone
- Rwanda wasn't genocide because some Tutsis survived
- The Holocaust wasn't complete because some Jews escaped
Also, your argument admits Israel has the capacity and potentially the desire for genocide, but is only restrained by external pressure. That's not the moral defense you think it is.
Reality is: 57k Palestinians killed, majority women and children, 90% of Gaza's population displaced, Systematic destruction of hospitals, schools, infrastructure, Blocking of humanitarian aid, Israeli officials making explicitly genocidal statements
Whether it meets your personal threshold for genocide is irrelevant. It's mass slaughter of civilians that multiple international bodies are investigating as potential genocide. Arguing about percentages while children are being killed is morally bankrupt.
>muh 5%
The UN Genocide Convention defines genocide as acts committed "with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group." There's no percentage threshold. The Srebrenica massacre killed "only" 0.5% of Bosnia's Muslim population and was ruled genocide by international courts. The key factor is intent to destroy a group, not hitting some arbitrary death percentage.
>they could do worse
That's like saying "I'm not an abuser because I could beat you harder if I wanted to." The capacity for greater violence doesn't justify current violence. By this logic:
- The Khmer Rouge wasn't genocidal because they "only" killed 25% of Cambodia instead of everyone
- Rwanda wasn't genocide because some Tutsis survived
- The Holocaust wasn't complete because some Jews escaped
Also, your argument admits Israel has the capacity and potentially the desire for genocide, but is only restrained by external pressure. That's not the moral defense you think it is.
Reality is: 57k Palestinians killed, majority women and children, 90% of Gaza's population displaced, Systematic destruction of hospitals, schools, infrastructure, Blocking of humanitarian aid, Israeli officials making explicitly genocidal statements
Whether it meets your personal threshold for genocide is irrelevant. It's mass slaughter of civilians that multiple international bodies are investigating as potential genocide. Arguing about percentages while children are being killed is morally bankrupt.
Page 1