Search Results
6/19/2025, 12:07:50 AM
>>95900387
I'm an artist. The gnolls look like they were painted individually and then put in together. The depth and perspective of the girl is all off, her legs and rabbit look way further back than her dress and body. Her hair looks like cloth too, her dagger arm is bent at a weird angle and her bicep on it + other arm looks weirdly muscular while the rest of her flesh is doughy. This is just generally bad and uncanny.
This looks like it was done by someone who knows how to render shit but does so in a way that's like polishing a turd without underlying structure, and the gnolls being blurry is a poor choice for trying to draw the focus onto the girl. Possibly the girl was painted wholy from scratch and the gnolls partly AI generated? Or the gnolls were painted over photobashed refs or something. I also get the feeling that this may have been done as a shorter (wide) image and then extended down, maybe the gnolls were done first and then Macris had him put the girl in. Or the gnolls and top half of the girl was done and then he had him extend it to include her legs to fill space.
Whatever the issues were, the overall composition and choices made were horrible, and the artist really needs to shore up his skills. He might be a lower-end dude trained for concept art and could be unfamiliar with doing full on scenes or complex back views, that would be one guess I'd make.
>>95900405
This isn't as unusual, I've seen quite a few pictures like this where some kinda crappy digital colors are slapped on some nice linework, usually as part of back cover art. It's a low-quality sign but not as egregious as the other one.
>>95900622
The fimshes are better, only problem is that several of them are just copy-pasted. A more skilled artist would have simply drawn the suggestion of many rather than detailing them all but this is way less uncanny than the others as I had to stare at it to realize that.
>>95900738
Same as the gnoll pic
+ looks like patchworked figure drawings
I'm an artist. The gnolls look like they were painted individually and then put in together. The depth and perspective of the girl is all off, her legs and rabbit look way further back than her dress and body. Her hair looks like cloth too, her dagger arm is bent at a weird angle and her bicep on it + other arm looks weirdly muscular while the rest of her flesh is doughy. This is just generally bad and uncanny.
This looks like it was done by someone who knows how to render shit but does so in a way that's like polishing a turd without underlying structure, and the gnolls being blurry is a poor choice for trying to draw the focus onto the girl. Possibly the girl was painted wholy from scratch and the gnolls partly AI generated? Or the gnolls were painted over photobashed refs or something. I also get the feeling that this may have been done as a shorter (wide) image and then extended down, maybe the gnolls were done first and then Macris had him put the girl in. Or the gnolls and top half of the girl was done and then he had him extend it to include her legs to fill space.
Whatever the issues were, the overall composition and choices made were horrible, and the artist really needs to shore up his skills. He might be a lower-end dude trained for concept art and could be unfamiliar with doing full on scenes or complex back views, that would be one guess I'd make.
>>95900405
This isn't as unusual, I've seen quite a few pictures like this where some kinda crappy digital colors are slapped on some nice linework, usually as part of back cover art. It's a low-quality sign but not as egregious as the other one.
>>95900622
The fimshes are better, only problem is that several of them are just copy-pasted. A more skilled artist would have simply drawn the suggestion of many rather than detailing them all but this is way less uncanny than the others as I had to stare at it to realize that.
>>95900738
Same as the gnoll pic
+ looks like patchworked figure drawings
Page 1