>>508419045
It already would make sense that Palantir was initially a panopticon, it always has to start off as a blank slate. But other than that I really think you're failing to understand what the technological progression actually entails. You say that engineering is going backwards but there's already artificial intelligence circuits in newer CPUs that break the rules of circuitry, yet they're somehow more efficient systems. The power of adversarial networks defies the way we arborescently perceive industrial mechanics. If I were you I wouldn't dare to meet this sort of phenomenon with immediate cynicism