Search Results
6/19/2025, 10:09:53 PM
>>105643851
Indeed. And I can make a simple non pervert image of a female hanging out on a beach in a bikini on perchance and unlike bing it wont try to imply strongly with warnings bikini are not ok and bad wrong when its just clothing for the beach and is as harmless as underwear and bra. but the lames at bing are terrified on female things and censor it.
>>105643895
I'm not sure but I know perchance uses a version of flux now since the graphics update a few weeks back. It no longer uses sd1.5 or any version of SD now.
Also vaguely related but I tend to slap this into my prompts on perchance depending on what im going for and it does make things look a little better from the high resolutions its set to. you can adjust the numbers to lower resolutions and you can see the differences in the variations.
the sprites and pixels both can be removed but the 2 main ones to note are resolution and characters.
"1920x1440 resolution, 1920x1440 characters, 1920x1440 sprites, 1920x1440 pixels.".
Indeed. And I can make a simple non pervert image of a female hanging out on a beach in a bikini on perchance and unlike bing it wont try to imply strongly with warnings bikini are not ok and bad wrong when its just clothing for the beach and is as harmless as underwear and bra. but the lames at bing are terrified on female things and censor it.
>>105643895
I'm not sure but I know perchance uses a version of flux now since the graphics update a few weeks back. It no longer uses sd1.5 or any version of SD now.
Also vaguely related but I tend to slap this into my prompts on perchance depending on what im going for and it does make things look a little better from the high resolutions its set to. you can adjust the numbers to lower resolutions and you can see the differences in the variations.
the sprites and pixels both can be removed but the 2 main ones to note are resolution and characters.
"1920x1440 resolution, 1920x1440 characters, 1920x1440 sprites, 1920x1440 pixels.".
Page 1