>>507671299
>become legally liable for showing sexual content to children
>IF they are incorporated in the state, which they aren't, otherwise it's an interstate commerce issue so not regulatable and isn't regulated by any state law
>oy gevalt intensifies instead of just operating like normal, which they could just do
>rest of (((network))) of porn sites tries to sell your analytics instead of telling you to make pornography more accessible to minors in your evil hekkin state
>digital prostitution still legal, thanks lawmakers
If you wrote fiction with this as a plot it'd be considered too farcically antisemetic to believe

Pornography has shown the sharp distinction between a slut and a whore and the negative societal effects of unregulated prostitution. From a first amendment perspective making pornography and profiting on it as a prostitute or pimp should be considered two entirely separate legal considerations. The /b/tards here all at some level know and have seen how a girl being a slut on the internet changes once she becomes a whore; there is an immediate decline in mental health, instability of behavior, all presaging a general negative life outcome. An egirl can post or get a thousand nudes leak and be fine but sell one and they damage themselves at a psychological level the same as jerking off guys at a truck lot, because it's what they're doing.