Search Results
6/29/2025, 3:59:31 PM
>>17800605
>boohoo you seem to be jealous
Jealous of what? Of a camel merchant’s murder spree? Nah, I’m good. Christians took centuries to gain power because they were busy being martyred, not carving empires. When they did, yeah, some fucked up heretics and pagans (sinners gonna sin). But that’s not Christ’s command; it’s humans twisting texts. Islam’s violence is straight from Muhammad’s mouth, no middleman needed.
>i-it’s le hecking parables
Luke 19:27’s a parable, dipshit. Jesus isn’t handing out swords; he’s talking judgment day. Bible’s got violence. Old Testament’s a rough neighborhood, but Christ’s New Covenant flips it: love your enemy, not behead them. Islam’s stuck on “smite their necks” (Quran 8:12). Spot the difference, genius.
>2 Timothy 3:16-17
Scripture’s inspired, sure, but Catholics don’t cherry-pick genocide orders. Old Covenant’s context is Israel’s survival, not a blank check for slaughter. Christ fulfills it: mercy over wrath. Muhammad’s still raiding caravans in your book.
>Someone who is in the weakest position offering mercy is laughable
Laughable? Forgiving from a cross is the ultimate flex; power in sacrifice, not conquest. Muhammad’s “mercy” after winning is just a victor’s PR stunt. Weak sauce.
>same justification the Quran gave
Crusades were about reclaiming holy sites, not forcing conversions or jizya. Jihad’s endgame is submission, not defense. Read Surah 9:29 again, brainlet. It’s not about pilgrims.
>no true catholic
Conquistadors weren’t Vatican hitmen. Greed drove them, not dogma. Islam’s violence is baked into the Quran and Hadith. Show me Catholic doctrine calling for global conquest. I’ll wait.
>Jesus said “not peace, but a sword”
Matthew 10:34 talks about division, not violence, retard. He’s talking spiritual strife, not jihad. Context matters, unlike your cherry-picked Quran peace verses that only kick in post-victory.
cont.
>boohoo you seem to be jealous
Jealous of what? Of a camel merchant’s murder spree? Nah, I’m good. Christians took centuries to gain power because they were busy being martyred, not carving empires. When they did, yeah, some fucked up heretics and pagans (sinners gonna sin). But that’s not Christ’s command; it’s humans twisting texts. Islam’s violence is straight from Muhammad’s mouth, no middleman needed.
>i-it’s le hecking parables
Luke 19:27’s a parable, dipshit. Jesus isn’t handing out swords; he’s talking judgment day. Bible’s got violence. Old Testament’s a rough neighborhood, but Christ’s New Covenant flips it: love your enemy, not behead them. Islam’s stuck on “smite their necks” (Quran 8:12). Spot the difference, genius.
>2 Timothy 3:16-17
Scripture’s inspired, sure, but Catholics don’t cherry-pick genocide orders. Old Covenant’s context is Israel’s survival, not a blank check for slaughter. Christ fulfills it: mercy over wrath. Muhammad’s still raiding caravans in your book.
>Someone who is in the weakest position offering mercy is laughable
Laughable? Forgiving from a cross is the ultimate flex; power in sacrifice, not conquest. Muhammad’s “mercy” after winning is just a victor’s PR stunt. Weak sauce.
>same justification the Quran gave
Crusades were about reclaiming holy sites, not forcing conversions or jizya. Jihad’s endgame is submission, not defense. Read Surah 9:29 again, brainlet. It’s not about pilgrims.
>no true catholic
Conquistadors weren’t Vatican hitmen. Greed drove them, not dogma. Islam’s violence is baked into the Quran and Hadith. Show me Catholic doctrine calling for global conquest. I’ll wait.
>Jesus said “not peace, but a sword”
Matthew 10:34 talks about division, not violence, retard. He’s talking spiritual strife, not jihad. Context matters, unlike your cherry-picked Quran peace verses that only kick in post-victory.
cont.
Page 1