As for anyone still trying to use words and arguments with females to explain yourself, I want you to understand that your words literally don't mean anything to them. They do not see you as an actual human being, they don't perceive men as "us", your words do not evoke actual feelings in them, it's no different than me making up gibberish words to explain my point of view to you.

It will never work, it will never amount to anything, you can be 100% factually correct, but it doesn't mean anything at all, because it doesn't make them feel anything, your arguments and pleas are basically discarded on a biological level. As soon as you finish your arguments, they will reload the wheel gun and start from the first chamber with the same lies and rolling accusations again and again and again until you are completely worn out. Female discourse is meant to reach a conclusion, it's meant to keep you under siege.

Pathos triumphs over logos, every time.

>>81765389
>I would also add that I think you are reading too much into it
This is where we have to agree to disagree, because I think you're not digging deep enough into this subject.

Most people bail out at surface level understandings of these dynamics because exploring them might lead to the discovery of very uncomfortable truths. It's far more comforting to just chalk it up to "wrong" ideology instead of accepting that these ideologies are the spawn of their feelings and instincts.

Anyway, good talk.