Search Results
7/12/2025, 7:25:27 AM
>>63972317
>Not the M375 and equivalent ones
they could defeat the weak spots in the T-64's armor all the same. it wasn't designed againt APFSDS at all.
>The NATO 105mm guns were simply entirely inept against the T-64.
Even 105mm APDS had 25% chance of defeating a T-64 frontally at 1km per soviet calculations, any new ammunition would turn this percentage on its head.
> It was just a superior tank.
it was a tank with superior armor, that's true. nothing more.
>This is blatantly false considering intended Soviet doctrine and tactics
pfffft, you're a fucking joke, mate. the only thing soviet doctrine would do is get them slaughtered en masse squandering any tactical advantages they could have. you should've learned it by now, with how many blow out pidors are littering the Ukrainian fields.
>Not the M375 and equivalent ones
they could defeat the weak spots in the T-64's armor all the same. it wasn't designed againt APFSDS at all.
>The NATO 105mm guns were simply entirely inept against the T-64.
Even 105mm APDS had 25% chance of defeating a T-64 frontally at 1km per soviet calculations, any new ammunition would turn this percentage on its head.
> It was just a superior tank.
it was a tank with superior armor, that's true. nothing more.
>This is blatantly false considering intended Soviet doctrine and tactics
pfffft, you're a fucking joke, mate. the only thing soviet doctrine would do is get them slaughtered en masse squandering any tactical advantages they could have. you should've learned it by now, with how many blow out pidors are littering the Ukrainian fields.
Page 1