>>16715338
well people that support hypothesis A argue that the spino did not have the capacity to dive and remain underwater
its bone density and air sacs made it impossible to do so
people that support hypothesis B could probably entertain that idea but they would probably make the point that its tail indicates that it was an active hunter that would chase its prey underwater, unlike ambush predators
>but anon, people often use the tail of crocodiles when discussing the Spinosaurus, and crocodiles are ambush predators.
True but crocodiles are aquatic ambush predators that hunt land animals (for the most part). I don't think Spinosaurus could do that with its massive sail sticking out of the water. The current position by people that are on the side of hypothesis B is that the tail was used in swimming and chasing down prey.
>>16715349
really? i actually didn't know that