>>6249451
>has even snapped at you for employing a "Dishonorable" and "Dirty" tactic to beat him in a game of Go.
lmao what

>>6249490
I think this one could be good. Because we're training them to be officers, we should assign each of them a small squad to assume command of in their hunt while scaling up the resistance accordingly. I also like >>6249470 's idea of an exceptionally dangerous "Golden Tail" that they might attempt to seek instead to challenge and distinguish themselves.