>>507527063
>>507527063
>I really appreciate how well spoken he is
he's a pretentious mongoloid. barely anything he says or writes makes literary sense. he strings together long words that do not actually belong, or fit with each other. this isn't being "well spoken," it's talking shit and anyone can talk shit. one finds oneself perpetually bemused by his relentless compulsion to inundate discourse with sesquipedalian affectations. lexical flourishes so tragically misplaced they seem less an exhibition of erudition than a parody of it. his utterances, both spoken and inscribed, rarely coalesce into anything resembling coherent literary architecture; rather, they resemble a ramshackle edifice built from words selected not for their meaning, but for their syllabic grandeur. this isn’t eloquence. it’s linguistic masturbation masquerading as insight. faggot.