>1/2
Robert Maxwell, a Czechoslovak-born British media proprietor, played a pivotal role in transforming scientific publishing into a highly profitable industry, which has had lasting implications on the peer review process and the broader scientific community. His company, Pergamon Press, became a dominant force in academic publishing, and Maxwell's business strategies significantly influenced the structure and practices of modern scientific journals

Maxwell's approach to publishing was marked by aggressive expansion and the commercialization of scientific knowledge. He recognized the potential profitability of scientific publishing at a time when it was largely viewed as a public good. By offering scientists financial incentives, lavish hospitality, and exclusive deals, he secured content for his journals, thereby building a vast publishing empire. This model prioritized novelty and controversy, often at the expense of long-term scientific inquiry and replication studies

One of the key controversies surrounding Maxwell's legacy is the impact of his business practices on the peer review process. While peer review remained a central component of scientific publishing, Maxwell's journals often emphasized rapid publication and sensational findings to attract readership and subscriptions. This approach contributed to a system where the prestige of publication in high-impact journals became a primary metric for scientific success, influencing funding and career advancement

Maxwell's influence extended beyond Pergamon Press. After his death in 1991, the consolidation of large publishing companies accelerated, leading to the dominance of a few major firms such as Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Springer, Taylor and Francis, and Sage. These companies inherited and perpetuated the business model that Maxwell helped pioneer, characterized by high profit margins and a focus on English-language content, which has been critiqued as a neo-colonial enterprise