Search Results
8/2/2025, 2:00:05 AM
>>511994848
You go ahead and break down your understanding of it, dumbass. They aren't drawing a conclusion in your cited paper. You're really fucking stupid. That paper only addresses mathematical accuracy of an LLM (fucking retarded), which is a huge problem with LLMs since they're language models anyway. Would be more sensible to just have a simple traffic steering proxy between the prompt and inference to steer from language to mathematical models.
Secondly, this is for fine tuning, which is not model tuning. They're taking a pretrained model and then fine tuning with synthetic data, I said training the model, not fine tuning the model. Tweaking a model that has already been trained is not the same as training an LLM model from scratch on synthetic data. Try again.
You go ahead and break down your understanding of it, dumbass. They aren't drawing a conclusion in your cited paper. You're really fucking stupid. That paper only addresses mathematical accuracy of an LLM (fucking retarded), which is a huge problem with LLMs since they're language models anyway. Would be more sensible to just have a simple traffic steering proxy between the prompt and inference to steer from language to mathematical models.
Secondly, this is for fine tuning, which is not model tuning. They're taking a pretrained model and then fine tuning with synthetic data, I said training the model, not fine tuning the model. Tweaking a model that has already been trained is not the same as training an LLM model from scratch on synthetic data. Try again.
Page 1