Search Results
ID: rwjNO61g/pol/511031168#511033127
7/22/2025, 11:01:43 AM
>>511032793
>Does it logically follow that pedophilia is morally acceptable
No, and I never claimed this.
>>511032811
There probably are evolutionary reasons for sexual attraction to children, but regardless, this is irrelevant to the moral status of adult-child sex.
>>511032827
>no children can understand or support sex
Children are fully capable of sexual desire, arousal, and orgasm.
>When a child get exposed to sexuality early, it always create a a major trauma / shock
This statement is refuted by empirical evidence >>511032143
>>511033013
Did I ever claim that adult-child sex was morally permissible because apes did it? I posted that in response to the claim that children lack the capacity to partake in sexual activities. Why would human children be the exception among great apes?
>Does it logically follow that pedophilia is morally acceptable
No, and I never claimed this.
>>511032811
There probably are evolutionary reasons for sexual attraction to children, but regardless, this is irrelevant to the moral status of adult-child sex.
>>511032827
>no children can understand or support sex
Children are fully capable of sexual desire, arousal, and orgasm.
>When a child get exposed to sexuality early, it always create a a major trauma / shock
This statement is refuted by empirical evidence >>511032143
>>511033013
Did I ever claim that adult-child sex was morally permissible because apes did it? I posted that in response to the claim that children lack the capacity to partake in sexual activities. Why would human children be the exception among great apes?
Page 1