Search Results
6/23/2025, 3:54:20 AM
>>508408403
I'll bet those 3 mystery cargo planes from China that came to Iran , took the Uranium away
I'll bet those 3 mystery cargo planes from China that came to Iran , took the Uranium away
ID: 2i9fchRf/pol/507589922#507592030
6/16/2025, 4:16:18 PM
>>507591364
>Where the fuck are my Pokemon cards, Luke?
akari!‽
>>507591392
>NK sent soldiers to fight with Russian troops and they got massacred due to retardation and lack of training.
but Iran prob just needs more missiles and supplies because you know israel will launch missiles non stop if america keeps supplying them
>Where the fuck are my Pokemon cards, Luke?
akari!‽
>>507591392
>NK sent soldiers to fight with Russian troops and they got massacred due to retardation and lack of training.
but Iran prob just needs more missiles and supplies because you know israel will launch missiles non stop if america keeps supplying them
ID: fjQG1605/pol/507562921#507566213
6/16/2025, 9:20:39 AM
>>507565576
>But Luke, who actually cares what an useless world organization says?
Report: UN Sanctions in Iraq WMD Conflict vs. Israel's Unilateral Actions Against Iran
Date: June 16, 2025, 03:19 AM EDT
Prepared by: Grok 3, xAI
Background
This report compares the UN-sanctioned WMD removal from Iraq post-1991 Gulf War with Israel's recent unsanctioned attacks on Iran, focusing on legal authority and due process.
UN Sanctions in Iraq
After Iraq's 1990 invasion of Kuwait, the UN Security Council imposed sanctions via Resolution 661 (August 1990), including an arms embargo. Post-war, Resolution 687 (April 1991) under Chapter VII mandated the destruction of Iraq's chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, plus long-range missiles, overseen by UNSCOM and IAEA. Iraq was required to grant full access to inspectors, though compliance was uneven until 1998, reflecting a binding, structured process.
Israel's Actions Against Iran
Israel's recent strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and assassinations lack UN Security Council approval or court sanction as of June 16, 2025. No evidence of an imminent attack justifies self-defense under Article 51, and the UN Secretary-General and IAEA have raised safety concerns without endorsing the actions. Legal experts suggest a potential breach of Article 2(4), with war crime risks if civilians were harmed, though no ICC or ICJ ruling exists.
Comparison
Iraq's WMD removal followed a UN-authorized framework with international oversight, while Israel's actions are unilateral, bypassing legal mechanisms. This contrast highlights a lack of due process in the Iran case, differing from the structured mandate in Iraq.
Conclusion
The Iraq case had clear UN backing, whereas Israel's strikes on Iran lack legal authority, raising international law concerns pending further review.
>But Luke, who actually cares what an useless world organization says?
Report: UN Sanctions in Iraq WMD Conflict vs. Israel's Unilateral Actions Against Iran
Date: June 16, 2025, 03:19 AM EDT
Prepared by: Grok 3, xAI
Background
This report compares the UN-sanctioned WMD removal from Iraq post-1991 Gulf War with Israel's recent unsanctioned attacks on Iran, focusing on legal authority and due process.
UN Sanctions in Iraq
After Iraq's 1990 invasion of Kuwait, the UN Security Council imposed sanctions via Resolution 661 (August 1990), including an arms embargo. Post-war, Resolution 687 (April 1991) under Chapter VII mandated the destruction of Iraq's chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, plus long-range missiles, overseen by UNSCOM and IAEA. Iraq was required to grant full access to inspectors, though compliance was uneven until 1998, reflecting a binding, structured process.
Israel's Actions Against Iran
Israel's recent strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and assassinations lack UN Security Council approval or court sanction as of June 16, 2025. No evidence of an imminent attack justifies self-defense under Article 51, and the UN Secretary-General and IAEA have raised safety concerns without endorsing the actions. Legal experts suggest a potential breach of Article 2(4), with war crime risks if civilians were harmed, though no ICC or ICJ ruling exists.
Comparison
Iraq's WMD removal followed a UN-authorized framework with international oversight, while Israel's actions are unilateral, bypassing legal mechanisms. This contrast highlights a lack of due process in the Iran case, differing from the structured mandate in Iraq.
Conclusion
The Iraq case had clear UN backing, whereas Israel's strikes on Iran lack legal authority, raising international law concerns pending further review.
ID: YenbXf4m/pol/507486455#507493097
6/15/2025, 7:27:12 PM
6/15/2025, 6:06:40 PM
>>507479210
drumpf started ww3
drumpf started ww3
6/15/2025, 5:05:36 PM
Page 1