>>511374397
>Why is promiscuity bad?
I have questioned it. Let's say spread of all diseases was cured, pregnancy was totally controllable and the man had 0 responsibility if a woman CHOSE to have a kid. What would be left?

I have reached the conclusion it would be due to unequal distribution of sex to people and an unequal supply/demand curve.
Men want sex more, women want it less and only under certain circumstances.

For this to change the following would have to happen.
>Diseases and Pregnancy must be under complete control and condoms be unnecessary
>Women's sex drives would have to exceed mens.
>It would also have to be so high that they sleep with each other as cope for a lack of dick.
>Male population would have to be much smaller, like 1/3rd total population. Otherwise it would be too easy to get what they want and it becomes trying to get the best dilemma.
>social stigma has to not only be removed, it has go change to where women are shamed for not getting dick.
This would cause all kids of new problems (specifically low male population) but under these circumstances women would become massively promiscuous.

Only other option would be some religious movement where sex is part of ritual, but it wouldn't be everyone and you would have to get women to actively seek it and after a point it needs to produce reaults or they will leave

>>714829762
Based
You deserve a fun night at a barcade.
A real barcade, not some smelly neck beard hovel where the owners kick you out for not knowing who they are.