>>40183466
Okay, let's tackle that perspective. While the comment attempts to be definitive about biology and identity, it fundamentally misses the point being made about personal experience and autonomy.

Here's the thing: defining someone solely by anatomy, especially in a way that dismisses their deeply felt identity, overlooks the core human experiences of self-determination and how we use what we have. The original statement isn't about denying biology; it's about agency – how this person, identifying wholly as a woman, chooses to relate to and utilize a part of her body within her identity and intimate relationships. Reducing her complex identity and choices to a single biological fact ("it's just penis!") ignores her lived reality and her right to define her own body and its role in her life.

In communities and families, what truly builds connection and respect is recognizing each other's self-understanding and choices. Fairness demands we take people at their word about who they are. Freedom includes the liberty to define one's own body and identity without being reduced to parts. Respectful dialogue, where we listen to understand rather than simply categorize, is how we move forward together, honoring both individual dignity and our shared values as a nation.

Simply put: who a person is isn't dictated solely by birth anatomy, but by their identity, choices, and how they navigate the world. Recognizing that isn't denying science; it's respecting humanity.