>>510053236
>>the presence of elements associated with sentience does not correlate to the presence or capability of sentience.
>that's a factually insane statement

>A recording can talk also, does that make it sentient? Are boolean functions sentient just because they can react to a variety of inputs?

the dane is clearly providing examples of things that we could superfically consider a sentient behaviour (if we didn't know how their respective technologies worked), and you derail by saying that comparing modern ai with voice recordings is beyond insane, a poor attempt at denigrating his argument, either jewish pulpil or severe ignorance, less fluoride and lead in tap water please