>>60498968
Adding a delay doesn't make forced relocation acceptable. You're just scheduling a crime against humanity for later.
Your false dichotomy, "if all Palestinians die from war, it would've been better for them if they were relocated", ignores the actual solution: stop killing them and let them stay in their homes. You're creating a choice between death and displacement when the moral option is neither.
You call relocation "simple and most probable optimistic outcome." Optimistic for whom? Not for the Palestinian families torn from their homes. Not for the children who lose their communities. You're optimizing for the convenience of the powerful, not the wellbeing of the displaced.

This isn't a "witch hunt." This is people correctly identifying that your "practical solution" is ethnic cleansing. No amount of AGI development will make forced population transfer morally acceptable.
You keep claiming critics don't understand your "thinking out loud" style. We understand perfectly: you thought out loud about ethnic cleansing, defended it with "existential" logic, and now you're upset about the response.
The "serious ethical discussion" you want would start with acknowledging that forced relocation is a crime against humanity, not proposing it as a solution. The timeframe doesn't matter. The technology level doesn't matter. Ethnic cleansing remains wrong whether done tomorrow or after AGI arrives.
Your "solution" isn't practical. It's monstrous.