Search Results
7/18/2025, 9:34:08 AM
>>63998286
>Or maybe shooting the enemy in the guts more with bullet hoses. Read your own fucking source and weep.
>SALVO
And let's talk about that for just a second. Can you please go and read some fucking SALVO and SPIW documentation, because I don't think you have the faintest clue that SALVO isn't an M4 or an M16 or anything like it. It's inane to try to say it's more like a battle rifle than an assault rifle or whatever, because frankly it really doesn't have much in common with any of them (yet another reason why I wish you faggots would at least be aware of what you're actually arguing for when you do try to invoke their shit).
SALVO wasn't going for anything lighter than NGSW M7, it was going for something about 2lb heavier. It also wasn't going for anything that had lighter ammunition than 7.62mm in the sense you think, either, it was going for stuff like what's in the picture. The weight per shot that they're talking about is the weight per bullet, not the weight per round. The weight per round was the same or higher, but each round was going to fire many bullets for a lower weight per round. The number of rounds, of this mostly-imaginary 3500FPS controlled dispersion nerve-toxin ammunition that they're boasting about boosting lethality with, that a soldier would carry would almost certainly be less than 6.8x51, but the number of bullets would be higher.
>Or maybe shooting the enemy in the guts more with bullet hoses. Read your own fucking source and weep.
>SALVO
And let's talk about that for just a second. Can you please go and read some fucking SALVO and SPIW documentation, because I don't think you have the faintest clue that SALVO isn't an M4 or an M16 or anything like it. It's inane to try to say it's more like a battle rifle than an assault rifle or whatever, because frankly it really doesn't have much in common with any of them (yet another reason why I wish you faggots would at least be aware of what you're actually arguing for when you do try to invoke their shit).
SALVO wasn't going for anything lighter than NGSW M7, it was going for something about 2lb heavier. It also wasn't going for anything that had lighter ammunition than 7.62mm in the sense you think, either, it was going for stuff like what's in the picture. The weight per shot that they're talking about is the weight per bullet, not the weight per round. The weight per round was the same or higher, but each round was going to fire many bullets for a lower weight per round. The number of rounds, of this mostly-imaginary 3500FPS controlled dispersion nerve-toxin ammunition that they're boasting about boosting lethality with, that a soldier would carry would almost certainly be less than 6.8x51, but the number of bullets would be higher.
Page 1