Search Results
7/23/2025, 3:19:28 PM
>>81929967
The future is gay, we're all going to be cute boys, and you won't be apart of it, disgusting nigger. Deal with it!
The future is gay, we're all going to be cute boys, and you won't be apart of it, disgusting nigger. Deal with it!
ID: 8LLcOhjc/pol/511129667#511129667
7/23/2025, 2:28:00 PM
ID: TOb7/kFZ/pol/509338061#509339046
7/2/2025, 10:51:18 PM
>>509338927
>>509338972
>About half of the older males (48%), and nearer two-third (60%) of the boys who were pre-adolescent at the time they contributed their histories, recall homosexual activity in their pre-adolescent years. The mean age of the first homosexual contact is about nine years, two and a half months (9.21 years)
- Alfredy Kinsey, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male
>>509338972
>About half of the older males (48%), and nearer two-third (60%) of the boys who were pre-adolescent at the time they contributed their histories, recall homosexual activity in their pre-adolescent years. The mean age of the first homosexual contact is about nine years, two and a half months (9.21 years)
- Alfredy Kinsey, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male
6/9/2025, 3:22:03 PM
>>17749506
>Rind et al. unequivocally concluded consensual adult-child sex is harmless and you are stupid for claiming otherwise.
It didn't conclude that consensual adult-child sex is harmless. You didn't understand the study. Maybe reading studies isn't for you.
>What matters is that you chose to derail your own thread and undermine your own arguments
I have never even argued that consensual adult-child sex is harmless. I don't even believe that consensual sex between adults is harmless. There are many harms which can come from consensual sex, for example, a White woman might consent to having sex with a Negroid, and produce a mixed-race baby, which I would consider harmful not only to the White woman, but to the monstrosity and to society at large.
I don't believe that consensual adult-child sex is likely to be harmful, a claim supported by the Rind study. I make sure not to misrepresent the findings of studies I cite, such as by claiming the Rind study proves that adult-child sex is harmless, as it undermines my argument and weakens my credibility. Perhaps, however, a well-poisoning, girl-grabbing kike might enter this thread to purposefully misrepresent the study in a vain attempt to undermine my arguments, which I would be diligent in correcting.
>>17749510
>But even in those it was still pretty much always against the rules and was also happening in the context of a very homophobic society
And it still produced the greatest men in world history. Sadly, anything even similar to the British boarding schools is unlikely to exist again any time soon. Perhaps in a more enlightened future society...
And thanks, I found the pic on /cm/, which I only found out about yesterday. Before that, the only image I had of boys kissing was pic rel. In all my years on 4chan, I had no clue there was a board where people posted cartoon images of little boys.
>Rind et al. unequivocally concluded consensual adult-child sex is harmless and you are stupid for claiming otherwise.
It didn't conclude that consensual adult-child sex is harmless. You didn't understand the study. Maybe reading studies isn't for you.
>What matters is that you chose to derail your own thread and undermine your own arguments
I have never even argued that consensual adult-child sex is harmless. I don't even believe that consensual sex between adults is harmless. There are many harms which can come from consensual sex, for example, a White woman might consent to having sex with a Negroid, and produce a mixed-race baby, which I would consider harmful not only to the White woman, but to the monstrosity and to society at large.
I don't believe that consensual adult-child sex is likely to be harmful, a claim supported by the Rind study. I make sure not to misrepresent the findings of studies I cite, such as by claiming the Rind study proves that adult-child sex is harmless, as it undermines my argument and weakens my credibility. Perhaps, however, a well-poisoning, girl-grabbing kike might enter this thread to purposefully misrepresent the study in a vain attempt to undermine my arguments, which I would be diligent in correcting.
>>17749510
>But even in those it was still pretty much always against the rules and was also happening in the context of a very homophobic society
And it still produced the greatest men in world history. Sadly, anything even similar to the British boarding schools is unlikely to exist again any time soon. Perhaps in a more enlightened future society...
And thanks, I found the pic on /cm/, which I only found out about yesterday. Before that, the only image I had of boys kissing was pic rel. In all my years on 4chan, I had no clue there was a board where people posted cartoon images of little boys.
Page 1