Search Results
7/21/2025, 11:35:21 PM
>>4450772
>But ISO 320 or 640?
>And by 1250, they look the same bro
With the absolute weakest attempt at correctly processing these files (via dpreviews website) and less fine detail, the better camera unsurprisingly looks better. Zoom out 50% my mac's screenshots are a bit fucked when I run windows on it.
You just don't know what to do with your cameras output, and have a habit of assuming that people will shoot every camera the same. With a Z7II and the same genre, well, the IBIS is actually pretty good, and there are actually lower ISOs to use unlike the usual IBIS copes. 1/10th at 85mm is easy and the ISO can be kept pretty low. You'd know if you actually took photos.
>But ISO 320 or 640?
>And by 1250, they look the same bro
With the absolute weakest attempt at correctly processing these files (via dpreviews website) and less fine detail, the better camera unsurprisingly looks better. Zoom out 50% my mac's screenshots are a bit fucked when I run windows on it.
You just don't know what to do with your cameras output, and have a habit of assuming that people will shoot every camera the same. With a Z7II and the same genre, well, the IBIS is actually pretty good, and there are actually lower ISOs to use unlike the usual IBIS copes. 1/10th at 85mm is easy and the ISO can be kept pretty low. You'd know if you actually took photos.
Page 1