>>511264901
>y-you're a tranny!
>completely misinterpreted the argument
it's impossible to discuss anything with a subhuman imbecile like you, I'm only replying to you in case actual human beings can read it
let me put this as simple as possible so your pathetic brain can grasp it:
there's a reason why smart people tend to have less kids, unless they have the means to
because high-IQ people prioritize the safety and development of their loved ones, as well as their "legacy", if there is one
that's why niggers don't raise their children, they only make more of themselves because that's what animals (like you) have the instinct to do
>so you are saying you are a subhuman retard because you want a robot that cant reproduce? are you for or against the robots?
obviously not
wanting a human woman without reproduction literally means you're a subhuman retard
wanting an AI/robotic woman that gives you all the benefits without none of the liabilities is clearly the way to solve this problem, all you have to do is wait a few years
it's insane I had to clarify this... but here we are