>>149408123
>his verse doesn't have Apophatic or Jungian scaling
baka

>>149397529
Anyway, again making my original point:
>Bigger infinities exist
>UM ACKSHULLY-
>They exist because I say so
Any author can do this, they don't need to understand math or split and explain the details so it can exist in a "Hard"-scifi setting like some Baxter suggsverse, don't care, let people have fun.