>>17845304
>if they are related variables they cannot confound each other
Except home environment is not a direct cause of "CSA". Not a single one of the studies you have posted has supported your assertion that home environment is the direct cause of "CSA", they have only stated that it increases the likelihood. You have misconstrued statements made in these papers to support your insane, novel argument.

>this would produce skew not confounding
It's confounding.

>You rely on a mythical case of a loving caring household where the parents offer up their children to pedophiles
Adult-child sexual contacts occur among children who come from a vast array of home environments. Not all children who have sexual contacts with adults come from poor home environments, the two can be measured independently, and studies which do find that home environment is far more predictive of negative outcomes than "CSA" status.

>Also you have no idea what the methodology was for any of the studies you have categorically rejected
I have offered valid critiques of the methodology of these studies throughout the thread, and any interested reader can see an in-depth critique of these methodological flaws present in these studies in this review here: >>17842527

>>17845311
>you have a small penis
Nice argument.