>>512666002
He has a very solid point but it's framed in the /pol/bant-hate way of instantly reacting. Which most of us just filter out to get to the meat of it, maybe the anon is not even meaning it that literally. It's shitty empty rhetoric is my point, many people use it here and many more exclusively use that that while never having a point so you're drowned into it, somehow it conditions you and let's be honest, it gets more (you)s, at least a guaranteed one from the person you insult.