Search Results
6/23/2025, 7:09:57 PM
>>508468457
The Daily Beast is claiming that the debate with Tucker Carlson and Ted Cruz had convinced Trump not to bomb Iran, but then Neo-Cons convinced him otherwise and now he wants to fire Tulsi Gabbard for telling him not to bomb either.
>According to Wolff, author of Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House, Trump watched the explosive interview between Tucker Carlson and Senator Ted Cruz that aired on the former Fox News host’s show on Wednesday, and for a short time afterwards, leaned towards siding with Carlson’s isolationist camp. Carlson, Steve Bannon and Marjorie Taylor Greene have been some of the most vocal MAGA opponents of U.S. intervention in the regional conflict.
>“Thursday, he was Tucker-Bannon, and he had seen Tucker’s interview with Ted Cruz where Ted Cruz got massacred,” Wolff said. “That was very much a there-but-for-the-grace-of-God moment for him.”
>But come Friday, Wolff claimed, Trump changed course after speaking with hawkish congressional Republican leaders, who got it into his head that he would look like a “winner” if he took action.
>“So by Friday afternoon, it was literally—in a whole series of phone calls— it was ‘f--- Tucker,’" he said, noting Carlson’s role as the “point person representing the MAGA objection” to the move.
>“Then the tenor of the phone calls was him saying, ‘I think I’m gonna look very good if I do this,’” he added, branding the precision strikes on Iran a “vanity bombing.”
>As for Gabbard, who recently backpedaled after Trump called her intelligence on Iran’s nuclear capabilities “wrong,” Wolff says she’s “toast.”
>“And there’s a lot of now, backpedaling, ‘he never liked her, she was forced on him.’ This is also, by the way, not true,” he went on.
The Daily Beast is claiming that the debate with Tucker Carlson and Ted Cruz had convinced Trump not to bomb Iran, but then Neo-Cons convinced him otherwise and now he wants to fire Tulsi Gabbard for telling him not to bomb either.
>According to Wolff, author of Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House, Trump watched the explosive interview between Tucker Carlson and Senator Ted Cruz that aired on the former Fox News host’s show on Wednesday, and for a short time afterwards, leaned towards siding with Carlson’s isolationist camp. Carlson, Steve Bannon and Marjorie Taylor Greene have been some of the most vocal MAGA opponents of U.S. intervention in the regional conflict.
>“Thursday, he was Tucker-Bannon, and he had seen Tucker’s interview with Ted Cruz where Ted Cruz got massacred,” Wolff said. “That was very much a there-but-for-the-grace-of-God moment for him.”
>But come Friday, Wolff claimed, Trump changed course after speaking with hawkish congressional Republican leaders, who got it into his head that he would look like a “winner” if he took action.
>“So by Friday afternoon, it was literally—in a whole series of phone calls— it was ‘f--- Tucker,’" he said, noting Carlson’s role as the “point person representing the MAGA objection” to the move.
>“Then the tenor of the phone calls was him saying, ‘I think I’m gonna look very good if I do this,’” he added, branding the precision strikes on Iran a “vanity bombing.”
>As for Gabbard, who recently backpedaled after Trump called her intelligence on Iran’s nuclear capabilities “wrong,” Wolff says she’s “toast.”
>“And there’s a lot of now, backpedaling, ‘he never liked her, she was forced on him.’ This is also, by the way, not true,” he went on.
6/23/2025, 7:04:29 PM
>>508474267
The Daily Beast is claiming that the debate with Tucker Carlson and Ted Cruz had convinced Trump not to bomb Iran, but then Neo-Cons convinced him otherwise.
>According to Wolff, author of Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House, Trump watched the explosive interview between Tucker Carlson and Senator Ted Cruz that aired on the former Fox News host’s show on Wednesday, and for a short time afterwards, leaned towards siding with Carlson’s isolationist camp. Carlson, Steve Bannon and Marjorie Taylor Greene have been some of the most vocal MAGA opponents of U.S. intervention in the regional conflict.
>“Thursday, he was Tucker-Bannon, and he had seen Tucker’s interview with Ted Cruz where Ted Cruz got massacred,” Wolff said. “That was very much a there-but-for-the-grace-of-God moment for him.”
>But come Friday, Wolff claimed, Trump changed course after speaking with hawkish congressional Republican leaders, who got it into his head that he would look like a “winner” if he took action.
>“So by Friday afternoon, it was literally—in a whole series of phone calls— it was ‘f--- Tucker,’" he said, noting Carlson’s role as the “point person representing the MAGA objection” to the move.
>“Then the tenor of the phone calls was him saying, ‘I think I’m gonna look very good if I do this,’” he added, branding the precision strikes on Iran a “vanity bombing.”
>As for Gabbard, who recently backpedaled after Trump called her intelligence on Iran’s nuclear capabilities “wrong,” Wolff says she’s “toast.”
>“And there’s a lot of now, backpedaling, ‘he never liked her, she was forced on him.’ This is also, by the way, not true,” he went on.
The Daily Beast is claiming that the debate with Tucker Carlson and Ted Cruz had convinced Trump not to bomb Iran, but then Neo-Cons convinced him otherwise.
>According to Wolff, author of Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House, Trump watched the explosive interview between Tucker Carlson and Senator Ted Cruz that aired on the former Fox News host’s show on Wednesday, and for a short time afterwards, leaned towards siding with Carlson’s isolationist camp. Carlson, Steve Bannon and Marjorie Taylor Greene have been some of the most vocal MAGA opponents of U.S. intervention in the regional conflict.
>“Thursday, he was Tucker-Bannon, and he had seen Tucker’s interview with Ted Cruz where Ted Cruz got massacred,” Wolff said. “That was very much a there-but-for-the-grace-of-God moment for him.”
>But come Friday, Wolff claimed, Trump changed course after speaking with hawkish congressional Republican leaders, who got it into his head that he would look like a “winner” if he took action.
>“So by Friday afternoon, it was literally—in a whole series of phone calls— it was ‘f--- Tucker,’" he said, noting Carlson’s role as the “point person representing the MAGA objection” to the move.
>“Then the tenor of the phone calls was him saying, ‘I think I’m gonna look very good if I do this,’” he added, branding the precision strikes on Iran a “vanity bombing.”
>As for Gabbard, who recently backpedaled after Trump called her intelligence on Iran’s nuclear capabilities “wrong,” Wolff says she’s “toast.”
>“And there’s a lot of now, backpedaling, ‘he never liked her, she was forced on him.’ This is also, by the way, not true,” he went on.
Page 1