>>105750158
I use it as a daily driver but to be honest the old "MOM PACMAN BROKE MY XORG CONFIG" kind of stuff hasn't happened to me in at least a decade. it's pretty stable. still probably would just use debian for servers because I'm set in my ways
and I don't know if up to date software necessarily means more or less vulnerabilities. what if there's a vuln that's introduced in an update? iirc arch was affected by the xzutils CVE-2024-3094. got a patch quickly but I believe arch was affected while debian stable was not

>>105750121
fuck outta with your philly jawn, we have more wawas than you do
but florida has us both beat for some reason