>>509862554
>none of the details make sense
Other than the edges at the top of the buildings, everything makes sense, and even those edges could be fixed had the original poster used inpainting.
You remind me of the plebbitards who keep criticizing AI art without ever pointing out what exactly is wrong with the pic they're criticizing. Moreover, I never see the same plebbitards criticizing the abstract, scribbly and/or brushed modern art, or CalArts, etc. They always treat AI art as if it's worse than all these, when it objectively isn't.
>and blends actual art
So which paintings have that pic blended? I'd like to see them.
>and the images fed into the algorithms will be of decreasing and decreasing quality
Even today not all human-made images are incorporated into checkpoints, a fine tuning is already expected with the release of any new checkpoint, and whatever faults it may have are fixed or almost fixed with the help of LoRAs.
You should actually check out what AI, localized AI at that, actually is, does, and how it operates.