>>715765586
>ban nazis
>everything right of Hillary Clinton is "nazis"
>ban rape porn
>looking at an attractive woman too hard is "rape"
>ban loli porn
>"height/face shape/eye size of consent" = 99% of anime girls are "lolis"
Simply put, I don't trust these people to arbitrate what is "moral" to me. Seems more like they just want to take and break my toys like a schoolyard bully.

>>715567456
This >>715567579
I still remember some porn hex maniax artist who got banned for "youthful face" around 3 years ago on Patreon, now you can say its because its wrong for porn to exist but just this year even a woman who made an indie game had this happen to her.
Its simple really, they want "moe" anime to die.

>>715534021
>All of the cancellations/censorings in that post happened before these new guidelines, though
IGN is being misleading when they say they were implemented on the Switch 2's release.
>Furthermore, Furukawa never said or even implied that the Switch platform would be a haven for your lolisho eroge
There is not and never has been eroge on Nintendo consoles. There has been games with ecchi rated T to M, which are now being banned or censored. So Furukawa still lied and yes, this is still a rug pull. Pic related is referring to a 12+ game by the way.

How do we solve the Nintendo problem?

>>714233695

Reminder, its nothing complex.
They just dont want japs.