Search Results
6/26/2025, 10:15:11 PM
Her var den: https://archive.fo/QZMTC (inn beføre ip fanger).
De mest interessante påstandene:
>>In general, the most expensive cost to the state for people born within Sweden was pensions, followed by childcare, schooling and health and social care. This is mainly due to the fact that most foreign-born people move to Sweden as adults so Sweden does not need to fund their schooling.
>>The most expensive posts for immigrants were financial benefits, child benefits and unemployment insurance, especially when it comes to refugees, as well as fees related to the justice system and integration.
Med andre ord:
>Innvandrer flytter til Sverige som voksen.
>En andel begynner å jobbe.
>De driter ut noen barn.
>Ungene tells som svensker og derfor anses som svensker i regnestykket, bortsett fra barnebidragene siden disse utbetales til foreldrene.
>Svenskeme må dermed betale for sine egne barn, innvandrernes barn og sine eldre.
>Innvandrerne må betale for tilnærmet ingen av delene (selv om hele poenget var å håndtere eldrebølgen).
Og slik fikk de til å si at innvandrerne bidrar mer enn noen andre. De må betale for ingenting, svenskene må betale for alt.
Se bilde. Finske innvandrere er verre enn Eritrere. Hvordan? De finske er pensjonerte arbeidsinnvandrere med få yngre finner som betaler for dem. Eritrerne må ikke betale for unger eller eldre, og er nesten like dårlig.
De mest interessante påstandene:
>>In general, the most expensive cost to the state for people born within Sweden was pensions, followed by childcare, schooling and health and social care. This is mainly due to the fact that most foreign-born people move to Sweden as adults so Sweden does not need to fund their schooling.
>>The most expensive posts for immigrants were financial benefits, child benefits and unemployment insurance, especially when it comes to refugees, as well as fees related to the justice system and integration.
Med andre ord:
>Innvandrer flytter til Sverige som voksen.
>En andel begynner å jobbe.
>De driter ut noen barn.
>Ungene tells som svensker og derfor anses som svensker i regnestykket, bortsett fra barnebidragene siden disse utbetales til foreldrene.
>Svenskeme må dermed betale for sine egne barn, innvandrernes barn og sine eldre.
>Innvandrerne må betale for tilnærmet ingen av delene (selv om hele poenget var å håndtere eldrebølgen).
Og slik fikk de til å si at innvandrerne bidrar mer enn noen andre. De må betale for ingenting, svenskene må betale for alt.
Se bilde. Finske innvandrere er verre enn Eritrere. Hvordan? De finske er pensjonerte arbeidsinnvandrere med få yngre finner som betaler for dem. Eritrerne må ikke betale for unger eller eldre, og er nesten like dårlig.
6/13/2025, 11:13:43 PM
>>507265329
>>507265398
>>507266063
>https://archive.fo/QZMTC
Key takeaways:
1. "Swedes" includes descendents of immigrants, who are usually less productive than their parents.
2. Refugees are a net burden, normal immigrants are contributing.
3. Immigrants "contribute" compared to Swedes in large part because they move to Sweden as adults and the state doesn't need to fund their expensive childcare/schooling.
4. These stats do not control by age either from what I can tell.
5. Somalis, Syrians, Eritreans, Ethiopians are a net burden, while Western Europeans, Yugoslavs, Chinese and Indians contribute (but again, claiming they contribute more than Swedes is dubious because they don't receive childcare benefits)
>>507265398
>>507266063
>https://archive.fo/QZMTC
Key takeaways:
1. "Swedes" includes descendents of immigrants, who are usually less productive than their parents.
2. Refugees are a net burden, normal immigrants are contributing.
3. Immigrants "contribute" compared to Swedes in large part because they move to Sweden as adults and the state doesn't need to fund their expensive childcare/schooling.
4. These stats do not control by age either from what I can tell.
5. Somalis, Syrians, Eritreans, Ethiopians are a net burden, while Western Europeans, Yugoslavs, Chinese and Indians contribute (but again, claiming they contribute more than Swedes is dubious because they don't receive childcare benefits)
Page 1