>>105966245
>no, its just that youre profoundly retarded, apparently
>where does it state "repeatability"?
I don't see how does this makes the image you have included in your post prove your claim that:
>the author doesnt understand what an rtos is about

>typical crab
>>find piece of advertisement
>>repost it on 4 chan like if it was r*ddit
You asked to:
>show me how it runs on an embedded system with RTOS requirements
So I showed you an article that describes how Rust runs on an embedded system with RTOS requirements.

Why are you constantly trying to move the goal post from your original point?
Why are you constantly trying to resort to ad hominem when faced with unexpected information.
Why are you talking about sexual fetishes out of nowhere?


It really puzzles me what makes C programmers behave this way. I wonder if this is some sort of defense or coping mechanism.
An inferiority complex perhaps?

Let's see how you respond to this post.