>>511222813
Is throwing a delicious political pasta into a large language model and telling it to push and pull on it using a described derective, add to the politics, or take away from it?

Attempting to assign a natural language name to a 32 +- 20 dimensional compute-object, that might be called "a self-isolated human brain operating system", buffed into existence by a 2 billion year old biological nanotechnology, that might be described as "gradient ascent for multiple multi-dimensional Calculus-9 differential engines for full-throat physics simulation" playing "federation mafia-game of musical chairs with every member juggling roaring chainsaw blades, where every tooth is an N-layer recurrent neural net with an LSTM temporal-retrograde kafka message queue pipelines between data centers" fighting each other for "front of the proverbial queue for a chance at a copy", as if it was a god damned Hashmap, that accepts a unique key?
ngmi, this is my politics, there are many like it, but this one is mine. Get behind me Satan.

Best thread on pol right now, literally nothing is happening. I'm changing the thread theme from red dixie cups to Cats.