Search Results
7/17/2025, 2:13:57 PM
>>510618373
Missed your post last night.
But
I thought the wording in picrel was…odd. And mildly threatening.
Interesting how none of the John Does have been unsealed in the Maxwell case Preska presided over…
Missed your post last night.
But
I thought the wording in picrel was…odd. And mildly threatening.
Interesting how none of the John Does have been unsealed in the Maxwell case Preska presided over…
7/17/2025, 2:13:57 PM
>>22948635
Missed your post last night.
But
I thought the wording in picrel was…odd. And mildly threatening.
Interesting how none of the John Does have been unsealed in the Maxwell case Preska presided over…
Missed your post last night.
But
I thought the wording in picrel was…odd. And mildly threatening.
Interesting how none of the John Does have been unsealed in the Maxwell case Preska presided over…
7/16/2025, 6:49:15 PM
https://nypost.com/2025/07/16/us-news/ghislaine-maxwells-family-breaks-silence-after-epstein-case-closes/
> They claim the writ of habeas corpus — a court order that requires a person in custody to appear before a judge to determine if their detention is lawful — would be “on the basis of new evidence such as government misconduct that would have likely changed the trial’s outcome.”
>“I’d be surprised if President Trump knew his lawyers were asking the Supreme Court to let the government break a deal,” Maxwell’s lawyer David Oscar Marcus said. “He’s the ultimate dealmaker — and I’m sure he’d agree that when the United States gives its word, it should keep it.”
>“With all the talk about who’s being prosecuted and who isn’t, it’s especially unfair that Ghislaine Maxwell remains in prison based on a promise the US government made and broke,” he added.
> They claim the writ of habeas corpus — a court order that requires a person in custody to appear before a judge to determine if their detention is lawful — would be “on the basis of new evidence such as government misconduct that would have likely changed the trial’s outcome.”
>“I’d be surprised if President Trump knew his lawyers were asking the Supreme Court to let the government break a deal,” Maxwell’s lawyer David Oscar Marcus said. “He’s the ultimate dealmaker — and I’m sure he’d agree that when the United States gives its word, it should keep it.”
>“With all the talk about who’s being prosecuted and who isn’t, it’s especially unfair that Ghislaine Maxwell remains in prison based on a promise the US government made and broke,” he added.
Page 1