Search Results
7/13/2025, 5:03:01 PM
>>510266279
This. White women pretending to be NatSoc and their simps will forever seethe because white men racemixing just isn't as big of a deal and is better than white women mixing. Part of racial competition is breeding another race's genes out to colonize foreign populations with your DNA. So letting your women racemix is bad, but letting your men racemix under certain conditions is beneficial. If done as a conqueror or explorer, and done enough, you create a hybridized population that is potentially more racially loyal to the colonizers than the colonized. The difference can be seen in Latin America where you have advanced countries like Argentina that are more white and identity more with their European roots than say Venezuela where you have much more Indio DNA and thus much more anticolonial attitudes. There's a reason why the Germans where able to seek out the Argentinians as stable allies during and after the war beyond just the geopolitical factors. The biological differences between male and female roles in reproduction creates an unavoidable numbers game. Every nonwhite woman you impregnate denies a nonwhite man access to reproducing a fully nonwhite child. Should racemixing be done within an ethnostate? No, it should be done on foreign soil only, the idea is to spread white genes out, not bring nonwhite genes in. And if an ethnostate accepts mixed people and gives them white status on account of their father, their marital rights and access to benefits should be less than a completely white person.
This. White women pretending to be NatSoc and their simps will forever seethe because white men racemixing just isn't as big of a deal and is better than white women mixing. Part of racial competition is breeding another race's genes out to colonize foreign populations with your DNA. So letting your women racemix is bad, but letting your men racemix under certain conditions is beneficial. If done as a conqueror or explorer, and done enough, you create a hybridized population that is potentially more racially loyal to the colonizers than the colonized. The difference can be seen in Latin America where you have advanced countries like Argentina that are more white and identity more with their European roots than say Venezuela where you have much more Indio DNA and thus much more anticolonial attitudes. There's a reason why the Germans where able to seek out the Argentinians as stable allies during and after the war beyond just the geopolitical factors. The biological differences between male and female roles in reproduction creates an unavoidable numbers game. Every nonwhite woman you impregnate denies a nonwhite man access to reproducing a fully nonwhite child. Should racemixing be done within an ethnostate? No, it should be done on foreign soil only, the idea is to spread white genes out, not bring nonwhite genes in. And if an ethnostate accepts mixed people and gives them white status on account of their father, their marital rights and access to benefits should be less than a completely white person.
Page 1