Search Results
7/3/2025, 2:39:29 AM
>>714329598
>As for definitions, I would define a male as someone who is genetically supposed to impregnate and a female as someone who is genetically supposed to be impregnated. I think that offers a clear distinction between the sexes without excluding cases where the reproductive organs aren't functioning for whatever reason.
It does exclude cases where reproductive organs aren't functioning, as long as the lack of reproductive functioning has a genetic cause. It also excludes older women who genetically have stopped menstrurating.
>Islam is just more accepting of transgenders than they are of homosexuals because they'd rather their gay son become a "straight woman".
Yes, traditionally speaking all Abrahamic societies are far more accepting of straight women (male) than gay men (male). Not saying discrimination didn't exist, but the idea that trannies are now MORE degenerate than sodomites is purely a product of the culture war needing to find a new sexual minority to demonize
>As for definitions, I would define a male as someone who is genetically supposed to impregnate and a female as someone who is genetically supposed to be impregnated. I think that offers a clear distinction between the sexes without excluding cases where the reproductive organs aren't functioning for whatever reason.
It does exclude cases where reproductive organs aren't functioning, as long as the lack of reproductive functioning has a genetic cause. It also excludes older women who genetically have stopped menstrurating.
>Islam is just more accepting of transgenders than they are of homosexuals because they'd rather their gay son become a "straight woman".
Yes, traditionally speaking all Abrahamic societies are far more accepting of straight women (male) than gay men (male). Not saying discrimination didn't exist, but the idea that trannies are now MORE degenerate than sodomites is purely a product of the culture war needing to find a new sexual minority to demonize
Page 1