>>509902420
I'm too tech illiterate. I gave it a try with olama and such, but it refused to parse and make informed answers based on any of my literature that's unorthodox to globohomo modern historical consensus.

I directly asked it a question about alleles advised by Richard Lynns work and it just gave an egalitarian response as to why that's bad to query.

I have an obsidian vault with 1000s of pol adjacent pdfs converted to markdown and I think this is a good well to spring from.

went to /g/ but "uncensored" there just means smut roleplay