>>532748310
>which is that you consistently reply to thread bakes regardless of the time & in a very small window, which points to scripted activity,
I mean couldn't it be that I am just generally consistent? I mean we've showed that there is variance. I have a question. If I were to able to show you that there actually is more variance than you think over the years would you concede on that front?
>There is no actual logical explanation, just "haha its a coincidence"
I mean I don't know what I can really say? Yeah I am awake when the threads are made? You can argue that its unlikely but its not impossible and the fact that I can get replies after the thread is made and still reply at a reasonable time kinda does prove that I am awake.
>This is blatantly faulty. You can't assume someone is there all of the time because they're there some of the time.
I mean you can argue its a coincidence but then I could just do the same thing? How many times would that need to happen for you to agree then? It might be hard to get evidence since I'm not very popular so I don't usually get replies but I could attempt to find some.