>>17784205
You're just asserting your indoctrinated talking points as fact, they've never been proven. There are no transitional fossils. But I'm sure you'll demand I "prove it" instead of you. It's funny, your "proof' for them is just stating the name of them, not actually proving they're transitional (because they're not).

Like your "Lucy" fraud. Polystrate fossils also prove your timeline is false and the layers were laid down in rapid succession, but you golems can't answer anything.