>>712800275

>timeless classic
RE2, RE4, REmake4
>excellent
RE3, REmake 2 (if it had proper A/B scenarios like the OG, it would've been higher)
>very good game
REmake (*), RE5, RE7
>decent but flawed
RE6, Rev 2, RE8
>okay-ish but strays far
Rev 1

>didn't play
the rest
>special mention
REmake 3, it's a disgrace how they butchered it. People who openly state it's better than REmake 4 should be forbidden from playing video games.

(*) people will probably think I'm shitposting but I played REmake very late and without having played the OG1 first. Because of that I missed out on appreciating two very important factors:

- the graphics (which, admittedly, were incredibly impressive at the time of its release)
- the faithful-but-improved reimagining of the original

Excluding these two, we're left with a very competent game that is otherwise unremarkable