Search Results
6/24/2025, 4:09:03 PM
>>24492454
> If you don't think anything is worth learning unless it can produce some new gizmo philosophy is not for you. At best it gives an answer to materialists, but most materialists aren't sufficiently speculatively inclined to understand the texts.
You are fucking insufferable. All of your opponents don't understand, aren't speculatively inclined, F I L T E R E D, and so on, in every thread. No, most of us are not inclined to spend months learning how to read gibberish prose especially when by your own admission it's just a way of thinking about common sense. You think you're smarter than everyone else here for being able to read this stuff. In fact, you are a retard for having wasted so much time on it.
> If you don't think anything is worth learning unless it can produce some new gizmo philosophy is not for you. At best it gives an answer to materialists, but most materialists aren't sufficiently speculatively inclined to understand the texts.
You are fucking insufferable. All of your opponents don't understand, aren't speculatively inclined, F I L T E R E D, and so on, in every thread. No, most of us are not inclined to spend months learning how to read gibberish prose especially when by your own admission it's just a way of thinking about common sense. You think you're smarter than everyone else here for being able to read this stuff. In fact, you are a retard for having wasted so much time on it.
6/24/2025, 4:07:23 PM
>>24492454
> If you don't think anything is worth learning unless it can produce some new gizmo philosophy is not for you. At best it gives an answer to materialists, but most materialists aren't sufficiently speculatively inclined to understand the texts.
You are fucking insufferable. All of your opponents are don't understand, aren't speculatively inclined, F I L T E R E D, and so on, in every thread. No, most of us are not inclined to spend months learning how to read gibberish prose especially when by your own admission it's just a way of thinking about common sense. You think you're smarter than everyone else here for being able to read this stuff. In fact, you are a retard for having wasted so much time on it.
> If you don't think anything is worth learning unless it can produce some new gizmo philosophy is not for you. At best it gives an answer to materialists, but most materialists aren't sufficiently speculatively inclined to understand the texts.
You are fucking insufferable. All of your opponents are don't understand, aren't speculatively inclined, F I L T E R E D, and so on, in every thread. No, most of us are not inclined to spend months learning how to read gibberish prose especially when by your own admission it's just a way of thinking about common sense. You think you're smarter than everyone else here for being able to read this stuff. In fact, you are a retard for having wasted so much time on it.
6/24/2025, 4:05:34 PM
>>24492454 (You)
> If you don't think anything is worth learning unless it can produce some new gizmo philosophy is not for you. At best it gives an answer to materialists, but most materialists aren't sufficiently speculatively inclined to understand the texts.
You are fucking insufferable. All of your opponents don't understand, aren't speculatively inclined, F I L T E R E D, in every thread. No, most of us are not inclined to spend months learning how to read gibberish prose especially when by your own admission it's just a way of thinking about common sense. You think you're smarter than everyone else here for being able to read this stuff. In fact, you are a retard for having wasted so much time on it.
> If you don't think anything is worth learning unless it can produce some new gizmo philosophy is not for you. At best it gives an answer to materialists, but most materialists aren't sufficiently speculatively inclined to understand the texts.
You are fucking insufferable. All of your opponents don't understand, aren't speculatively inclined, F I L T E R E D, in every thread. No, most of us are not inclined to spend months learning how to read gibberish prose especially when by your own admission it's just a way of thinking about common sense. You think you're smarter than everyone else here for being able to read this stuff. In fact, you are a retard for having wasted so much time on it.
6/24/2025, 4:03:35 PM
>>24492454
> If you don't think anything is worth learning unless it can produce some new gizmo philosophy is not for you. At best it gives an answer to materialists, but most materialists aren't sufficiently speculatively inclined to understand the texts.
You are fucking insufferable. All of you opponents are people who don't understand, who aren't speculatively inclined, F I L T E R E D, and so on, in every thread. No, most of us are not inclined to spend months learning how to read gibberish prose especially when by your own admission it's just a way of thinking about common sense. You think you're smarter than everyone else here for being able to read this stuff. In fact, you are a retard for having wasted so much time on it.
> If you don't think anything is worth learning unless it can produce some new gizmo philosophy is not for you. At best it gives an answer to materialists, but most materialists aren't sufficiently speculatively inclined to understand the texts.
You are fucking insufferable. All of you opponents are people who don't understand, who aren't speculatively inclined, F I L T E R E D, and so on, in every thread. No, most of us are not inclined to spend months learning how to read gibberish prose especially when by your own admission it's just a way of thinking about common sense. You think you're smarter than everyone else here for being able to read this stuff. In fact, you are a retard for having wasted so much time on it.
Page 1