Let's assume for a moment that you are right. If that were the case, would you be capable of quantifying how my original ideas conditioned this output? Or would you, as I detailed above, simply collapse the entire dynamic by designating the single aspect most salient to your perception?

Of course you would choose the latter. Your reply is the proof: a single-word, pre-packaged script. It’s the ultimate narrative shortcut, the most energetically economical move possible: designation in its purest, automated form.

So, let's ask again: Whose move follows a simple, predictable script? Who is the one cornered now? And who has adapted with cunning and a sense of opportunity?