>>11297372
there *are* no available metrics. nobody is studying this stuff.
anyone claiming they "know" things about femdom is a liar because it just isn't in the scientific literature except as a historical and cultural oddity. sometimes people like to reference studies that are not about femdom and claim that it has something to do with femdom, except it basically always doesn't. one thing you will find in the scientific literature is a whole lot of disagreement about what can even be considered femdom, which is very boring.
>>11297413
>I've also been in various internet BDSM communities
So have I. But I've also worked in scientific research and taken a couple of stats and methodology courses. Which tells me that your experience means shit, and my experience means shit. I've been in two, count 'em, two, relationships with dominant women. That tells me nothing. That is not how it works.
>>11297398
Anyone who believes there is a large group of undiscovered dominant women is definitely believing things and therefore wrong. People in today's society are so used to the idea that the answer is out there that they don't know what to do when the answer is not, in fact, out there.
You don't know things. I don't know things.
Stop pretending you do. I don't do that.