>>60633617
Ah I see, it's more for marketing? Makes sense but I think people will naturally spend it anyway because it fulfills a unique need unlike most of other cryptos,
>>60633621
I honestly don't see why even intelligent and well educated people (in non-tech topics) buy into the Saylor narrative of BTC being some great store of value that will make every other asset worthless simply because there are only 21M of unique non-fungible coins.