Search Results
7/11/2025, 1:36:30 PM
7/7/2025, 5:17:26 PM
7/5/2025, 11:40:37 PM
>>509602837
Yes, you use intellectualism to compensate for the lack of realisation in your religion. And it is characteristically jewish legalist debate, not the higher Platonic dialogues of the Greeks. In fact, I was reading a page a while ago about how this term changed meaning in the Christian context. The old dialogues were not 'debates', but more of a rhetorical style that later classicists upheld faithfully. Your anti-religion poisons everything it touches. It sticks out like a sore thumb. Caesar did not debate, he exuded pure spirit. It is true that debate did exist before, however the Jewish tradition is enmeshed in covenental contractualism and 'debating with god'. You have a hypertrophy of intellectualism. The Romans do not debate. The Indians do not debate. The Japanese do not debate. You think you can talk your way into heaven.
It's a bit like going to a race circuit and bragging that you are good at pogo stick. Different genres entirely. You want to 'prove' what you lack. Even when the Greeks debated, it took a secondary posture. Your religion is about being nagged to death, usually by women or jews. You think you can 'talk' your way out of it because of your singular Marxist 'truth'. A Christian says 'have you read the bible', a marxist says 'read Marx.' Same energy, spiritual nigger. I've never been challenged to debate by a guru.
Yes, you use intellectualism to compensate for the lack of realisation in your religion. And it is characteristically jewish legalist debate, not the higher Platonic dialogues of the Greeks. In fact, I was reading a page a while ago about how this term changed meaning in the Christian context. The old dialogues were not 'debates', but more of a rhetorical style that later classicists upheld faithfully. Your anti-religion poisons everything it touches. It sticks out like a sore thumb. Caesar did not debate, he exuded pure spirit. It is true that debate did exist before, however the Jewish tradition is enmeshed in covenental contractualism and 'debating with god'. You have a hypertrophy of intellectualism. The Romans do not debate. The Indians do not debate. The Japanese do not debate. You think you can talk your way into heaven.
It's a bit like going to a race circuit and bragging that you are good at pogo stick. Different genres entirely. You want to 'prove' what you lack. Even when the Greeks debated, it took a secondary posture. Your religion is about being nagged to death, usually by women or jews. You think you can 'talk' your way out of it because of your singular Marxist 'truth'. A Christian says 'have you read the bible', a marxist says 'read Marx.' Same energy, spiritual nigger. I've never been challenged to debate by a guru.
6/26/2025, 4:08:08 PM
>>508786570
Neoplatonic cults were directly subverted with Jewish kabbalah and were centres of initiation akin to Eleusis, Orpheus, or Mithras. The Christian baptism is a larp devoid of actual epiphany and initiative experience.
I know this is hard to understand when the jewish literal larp and propaganda usurpation has ruined your brain forever. Augustus and many subsequent emperors were initiates, as were much of the public. We see something similar in India today where retirees will seek contemplation and spiritual realisation towards the end of their life.
There is also a warrior component to this but it's already too complex for your tiny judaised larp brain.
>no u are the larper
Jews suppressed this and made you larp, you cant even fathom it.
>The Roman temple, when it was originally built, would have stood on the east bank of the now covered-over River Walbrook, a key freshwater source in Roman Londinium. Nearby, in its former streambed, a small square hammered lead sheet was found, on which an enemy of someone named Martia Martina had inscribed her name backwards and thrown the token into the stream, in a traditional Celtic way of reaching the gods that has preserved metal tokens in rivers throughout Celtic Europe, from the swords at La Tène to Roman times (compare wishing well.) The temple foundations are very close to other important sites in the city of London including the historic London Stone, the Bank of England and London Wall. The original Mithraeum was built partly underground, recalling the cave of Mithras where the Mithraic epiphany took place.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Mithraeum#
Neoplatonic cults were directly subverted with Jewish kabbalah and were centres of initiation akin to Eleusis, Orpheus, or Mithras. The Christian baptism is a larp devoid of actual epiphany and initiative experience.
I know this is hard to understand when the jewish literal larp and propaganda usurpation has ruined your brain forever. Augustus and many subsequent emperors were initiates, as were much of the public. We see something similar in India today where retirees will seek contemplation and spiritual realisation towards the end of their life.
There is also a warrior component to this but it's already too complex for your tiny judaised larp brain.
>no u are the larper
Jews suppressed this and made you larp, you cant even fathom it.
>The Roman temple, when it was originally built, would have stood on the east bank of the now covered-over River Walbrook, a key freshwater source in Roman Londinium. Nearby, in its former streambed, a small square hammered lead sheet was found, on which an enemy of someone named Martia Martina had inscribed her name backwards and thrown the token into the stream, in a traditional Celtic way of reaching the gods that has preserved metal tokens in rivers throughout Celtic Europe, from the swords at La Tène to Roman times (compare wishing well.) The temple foundations are very close to other important sites in the city of London including the historic London Stone, the Bank of England and London Wall. The original Mithraeum was built partly underground, recalling the cave of Mithras where the Mithraic epiphany took place.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Mithraeum#
Page 1