Search Results
6/16/2025, 6:09:04 PM
>>507600328
We will never forget the man who single-handedly shattered the liberal world order.
Liberalism, at its core, is supposed to mean governance by the consent of the people. Yet this man pushed for forced vaccination campaigns, branding anyone who refused as a "Nazi"—a darkly ironic twist.
This, from someone who constantly preaches about women’s rights and the importance of consent. It’s almost comical—textbook psychological projection. Makes you wonder what secrets he’s hiding behind closed doors.
We will never forget the man who single-handedly shattered the liberal world order.
Liberalism, at its core, is supposed to mean governance by the consent of the people. Yet this man pushed for forced vaccination campaigns, branding anyone who refused as a "Nazi"—a darkly ironic twist.
This, from someone who constantly preaches about women’s rights and the importance of consent. It’s almost comical—textbook psychological projection. Makes you wonder what secrets he’s hiding behind closed doors.
6/13/2025, 3:22:40 PM
>>507215522
They don’t just want control — they want domination, humiliation, and spectacle. Mass immigration? That wasn’t compassion — it was the first stage in a calculated plan to dissolve national identity, atomize the population, and replace resistance with compliance. After 9/11, people began questioning the system, so the response wasn’t reform — it was demolition, dressed up as progress.
The architects of this decay don’t hide it — they call it “global governance,” “equity,” or “humanitarian intervention.” But behind the buzzwords lies a machinery of conquest. The wars in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Gaza — they weren’t just about resources or strategy. They were mass rituals of destruction — televised bloodletting to reinforce control. Cities reduced to rubble, children buried under drone strikes, entire populations displaced — not as collateral, but as demonstration.
They divide people by race, gender, class — turn neighbor against neighbor — while laughing behind the scenes. Culture is rewritten, speech is policed, and anyone who sees through it is branded a threat. The media sells the war, the banks fund it, and the NGOs clean it up — a closed loop of carnage and profit.
Meanwhile, the citizens of once-sovereign nations are taxed into submission, gaslit into silence, and told to celebrate their own erasure. This isn’t policy failure — it’s psychological warfare. It’s not about money — they already have that. It’s about total domination, control of the mind, and the crushing of anything human that might still resist.
They don’t just crave power — they need it, like an addict needs a fix. Decades of cultural rejection, moral decay, and unfulfilled desire have twisted their psyche. Their hunger for domination has become pathological, almost ritualistic. Where healthy societies channel energy into creation, theirs is fixated on control — a substitute for the deep emptiness that festers within.
They don’t just want control — they want domination, humiliation, and spectacle. Mass immigration? That wasn’t compassion — it was the first stage in a calculated plan to dissolve national identity, atomize the population, and replace resistance with compliance. After 9/11, people began questioning the system, so the response wasn’t reform — it was demolition, dressed up as progress.
The architects of this decay don’t hide it — they call it “global governance,” “equity,” or “humanitarian intervention.” But behind the buzzwords lies a machinery of conquest. The wars in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Gaza — they weren’t just about resources or strategy. They were mass rituals of destruction — televised bloodletting to reinforce control. Cities reduced to rubble, children buried under drone strikes, entire populations displaced — not as collateral, but as demonstration.
They divide people by race, gender, class — turn neighbor against neighbor — while laughing behind the scenes. Culture is rewritten, speech is policed, and anyone who sees through it is branded a threat. The media sells the war, the banks fund it, and the NGOs clean it up — a closed loop of carnage and profit.
Meanwhile, the citizens of once-sovereign nations are taxed into submission, gaslit into silence, and told to celebrate their own erasure. This isn’t policy failure — it’s psychological warfare. It’s not about money — they already have that. It’s about total domination, control of the mind, and the crushing of anything human that might still resist.
They don’t just crave power — they need it, like an addict needs a fix. Decades of cultural rejection, moral decay, and unfulfilled desire have twisted their psyche. Their hunger for domination has become pathological, almost ritualistic. Where healthy societies channel energy into creation, theirs is fixated on control — a substitute for the deep emptiness that festers within.
6/12/2025, 1:36:20 PM
if you kill every single hohol they win, which means russia is losing
6/12/2025, 9:15:07 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=br2wtmfARUA
Today, we see men desperately seeking validation, not through critical thinking or dialogue, but through institutional approval. They appeal to credentials, not arguments — deferring to so-called experts who echo the political status quo under the guise of science. But what’s really happening isn’t scientific inquiry — it’s credentialed gatekeeping, funded and incentivized by political and financial interests. These actors aren’t scientists, they’re functionaries in a system that rewards conformity over truth.
This video exemplifies that contradiction: it mourns the death of intellectualism while discouraging critical thought, urging people to stop questioning and simply trust media-appointed experts. But genuine expertise doesn’t need to suppress dissent. In this system, dissenting voices are silenced, fired, and discredited — not for being wrong, but for not towing the line.
This mindset reveals a deeper insecurity. Many tie their self-worth to institutional acceptance — they need others to “trust the science,” not for truth’s sake, but to affirm their own identity. When we laugh at the authority of state-issued credentials, they feel personally attacked because their sense of self is rooted in that system.
But this game is hollow. You know it, deep down — no matter how many people you pressure into compliance, it won’t bring meaning. You serve a system that betrayed its own principles, that replaced liberty with surveillance, and intellect with obedience. And when people like me reject that — reject being told what to think, what to inject, who to trust — you call it anti-intellectualism. But it’s the opposite.
You don’t defend truth. You defend your role in a lie.
Today, we see men desperately seeking validation, not through critical thinking or dialogue, but through institutional approval. They appeal to credentials, not arguments — deferring to so-called experts who echo the political status quo under the guise of science. But what’s really happening isn’t scientific inquiry — it’s credentialed gatekeeping, funded and incentivized by political and financial interests. These actors aren’t scientists, they’re functionaries in a system that rewards conformity over truth.
This video exemplifies that contradiction: it mourns the death of intellectualism while discouraging critical thought, urging people to stop questioning and simply trust media-appointed experts. But genuine expertise doesn’t need to suppress dissent. In this system, dissenting voices are silenced, fired, and discredited — not for being wrong, but for not towing the line.
This mindset reveals a deeper insecurity. Many tie their self-worth to institutional acceptance — they need others to “trust the science,” not for truth’s sake, but to affirm their own identity. When we laugh at the authority of state-issued credentials, they feel personally attacked because their sense of self is rooted in that system.
But this game is hollow. You know it, deep down — no matter how many people you pressure into compliance, it won’t bring meaning. You serve a system that betrayed its own principles, that replaced liberty with surveillance, and intellect with obedience. And when people like me reject that — reject being told what to think, what to inject, who to trust — you call it anti-intellectualism. But it’s the opposite.
You don’t defend truth. You defend your role in a lie.
Page 1