>>7655512
permabeg
>>7655990
id say high beg, if you put more time into refining it then higher. it looks low contast and not seeing much highlights
>>7656584
i dont know how to rate furries but she looks very nice
>>7656878
again i dont know how to rate furry shit but for the humans i agree with the other posters for the most part, you draw appealing faces with acceptable anatomy (besides the necks), but its just not very interesting. try backgroundmaxxing and make characters actually do something instead of whitevoiding.
>>7657110
it has appeal, its hard to make out whats going on in the more colorful stuff though. i would like to see your power with a tablet, are you going to get one? for now i'd say midbeg because you have an idea of anatomy, colors, and a little perspective, but its hard to rate it any higher

i'd rate myself mid/high beg, still lots of shit to work on, but curious to see if you guys disagree with me or not