>>716335910
>People lie about their age and other users can gift games, even NSFW slop, to others
None of this is the fault of adult content sellers. This line of logic could feasibly see most things in society banned because "negligence could lead to children accessing it". The solution is to deal with the negligence, not go after what the brats got into.
>Your fucking point?
You're being dishonest like everyone else who uses unchained brats as a moral license to destroy what they please. Let me tell you something; banning adult content is not going to do a fucking thing to fix the issues you think it will. It's not gonna raise birth rates, it's gonna stop trannies from wanting to go after kids, it's not gonna make anyone any more well adjusted because the source of the issue is not some lewds on the internet, but social trends that date back to the 60s. You know why kids are turning out fucked up these days? Anywhere from a third to half of them are born out of wedlock to single whore moms. They're pushed through a broken school system where they must deal with aggressive browns and incompetent cynical teachers. They live in constant fear of making a social faux pas that will ruin their lives (cancel culture). They can't interact with women because of all the landmines placed by feminist social policies and legal systems that always favor the woman over the man. Half the fucking country is on antidepressants these days. You wanna "protect the children"? Tackle these monumental social issues instead of going after low-hanging fruit that was never intended for brats to begin with and pretending you're virtuous. Because I can assure you that what you propose won't do shit.

>>105574055
Holy shit I love rust now!